I bet you’ve never thought of using a lawyer on a speeding ticket before. First of all though, I encourage you to not get into this position in the first place. Obeying the law is always the best and most cost effective option. But, here are some reasons why to use an attorney in the case that you do get hit with a moving violation citation:
1. Cost Savings All the Way are in store for those that choose to use an attorney to fight their traffic tickets. Let’s say that you got pulled over and your ticket was written for $80. You might be thinking, “It’s just $80. I don’t want to waste my time fighting it in court or worse, paying an attorney bookoo bucks to fight it for me.” This is exactly what the State wants you to think. They need revenue and traffic tickets are a pretty good source of it. Paying it is also an automatic admission of guilt — not good if you are challenging it. But, the main killer is your insurance premium. For the numbers let’s look at an article written in MSN MoneyCentral:
Let’s say you’re an experienced driver in California with a single-car policy and a good driving record, paying average rates statewide for liability, collision and comprehensive insurance coverage. That’s about $920 annually. If you were an Allstate customer, you’d get a 20% good-driver discount and pay only $736. One speeding ticket would bring that to $1,129 annually, Allstate says. Get a second minor ticket and you’d lose your good-driver discount. Your premium would rise again, to $1,479, the company says. After a third ticket, expect to pay $1,631. Over three years you would end up paying about $2,685 more than if you’d kept your nose clean. Ouch.Ouch is right! So to recap the numbers: from “good-driver” status ($736 annually) to one ticket will for the next 3 years (how long insurance companies usually remember your traffic tickets) will cost you a total of $1179 ($393 x 3 yrs); after the second ticket you’d be at $1,479 annually, costing you a total of $2229 ($743 x 3 yrs), etc.
2. A Lawyer Does This for a Living But, you’re probably wondering, “If I pay an attorney to fight it for me, then I’ll just end up paying more and I don’t know if he/she will be able to do anything for me.” Good, you’re thinking. Let’s look at one of the plethora of testimonials I’ve read about people using an attorney to represent them in traffic court:
On January 22, I received a traffic citation. it was the first one I had ever received and I was, understandably, upset. I contacted [my lawyer]….I was advised that the firm would handle the matter for me. An attorney hearing was held on March 18 and the matter was resolved. The outcome for me was that there would be no reporting to my insurance company and the incident would be reduced to a parking ticket. The fine that I paid was considerably less than the original citation called for.-M. Chaplin, NV- 1
To emphasize this, imagine you are fifteen years old again. You pull a harmless practical joke in class and get caught. Who would you rather defend you before the teacher, the captain of the debate team, who the teacher adores, or you, the accused? Now to put that into perspective, Judges generally like lawyers because they are or used to be lawyers themselves. You are probably untrained in the law, courtroom procedure, etc. To a judge, you are a little kid asking that your “time out” punishment be shortened. A lawyer on the other hand is akin to one of the judge’s buddies on his bowling team. They’ll probably go out for a drink after your hearing and gripe about people that try to represent themselves.
So, spend the $100 to have an attorney represent you in traffic court and save points on your record and thousands in your wallet.
(1 – Pre-Paid Legal, Inc. “In Their Own Words: a collection of our members’ success stories.” 2006)
